Mazda’s CX-50 and Toyota’s RAV4 small SUVs share more similarities than differences, making it challenging to decide which one to invest in. The CX-50 distinguishes itself by venturing into the upscale market with its polished interior, while the popular RAV4 offers hybrid choices that excel in fuel efficiency rankings. The distinction lies in aesthetics and the available powertrains.
The 2025 Mazda CX-50 surpasses the smaller CX-5, Mazda’s long-standing bestseller. It is larger, more spacious, and shifts away from the sleek style of the urban CX-5 towards a more Americanized design. The 2024 Toyota RAV4 continues to enhance its gas, hybrid, and plug-in hybrid powertrain options with improved in-car technology and a selection of 13 trims, spanning from basic to luxurious. Toyota’s wide range of offerings has caught Mazda’s attention, even though it risks overshadowing the attractive yet aging CX-5.
Between the established contender and the newcomer, which one is superior? More importantly, which model best suits your requirements? Let’s delve into a category-wise comparison.
Comparison of Prices and Configurations for Mazda CX-50 and RAV4
The starting price for the Mazda CX-50 is $32,000, going up to nearly $45,000. The RAV4’s price ranges from $30,000 to over $50,000 for a fully loaded Prime version. Recommended choices: CX-50 2.5S Premium, Toyota RAV4 XLE Hybrid. What is the cost of a Mazda CX-50? Which Mazda CX-50 model should you select?
Following in the footsteps of Toyota’s diverse lineup, the Mazda CX-50 provides a selection of two different powertrains across eight trim levels. It comes standard with all-wheel drive, while Toyota charges an additional $1,400 for the same feature. Standard features include advanced driver-assist technologies, keyless start, fabric upholstery, an 8.8-inch touchscreen with wireless connectivity for Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, and 17-inch alloy wheels. Toyota holds the edge in in-car technology as Mazda opts for a console-mounted controller dial as the main interface over the harder-to-reach touchscreen.
Options range from an upgraded 10.3-inch touchscreen, a 12-speaker Bose audio system, leather seats, heated and cooled power front seats, and a panoramic sunroof. These features are available in the recommended model, the approximately $35,000 2.5S Premium, unless you prefer the more potent turbocharged engine in the 2.5 Turbo for an extra $4,000.
Priced around $42,000, the Meridian Edition with the 2.5 Turbo competes with the off-road-focused RAV4 TRD models, incorporating all-terrain tires on its 18-inch alloy wheels, along with side rockers, a hood decal, and distinct beige leather interior known as Terracotta by Mazda.
The top-tier 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus model costs almost $54,000, positioning Mazda in the premium category alongside Lincoln, Lexus, and Genesis. It boasts a surround-view camera system, leather upholstery, a heated steering wheel, heated and ventilated front seats, heated rear seats, a wireless smartphone charger, front and rear parking sensors, navigation, blind-spot monitors with steering support, and 20-inch wheels.
A new Hybrid variant is priced at approximately $35,000 or higher; this comparison will be updated post its evaluation.
Cost of a Toyota RAV4? Which Toyota RAV4 model should you opt for?
While even the highest-end RAV4 falls short of the most luxurious CX-50, Toyota offers competitive pricing at the top end, excluding the plug-in hybrid Prime models. With fifteen trim choices and a wide price range, the Toyota RAV4 accommodates customers from the $30,000 mark to over $40,000 for the Hybrid Limited variant, with the base LE model offering a strong value proposition with any powertrain. The LE model includes 17-inch wheels, adaptive cruise control, cloth seats, and an 8.0-inch touchscreen supporting wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
The Hybrid versions in LE, XLE, SE, XLE, XSE, and Limited trims are priced $2,600-$3,000 higher than their gas counterparts. The most efficient, powerful, and enjoyable powertrain in the RAV4 lineup belongs to the RAV4 Prime plug-in hybrid. The Prime SE is priced at about $45,000, approximately $9,000 more than the Hybrid SE. The Prime XSE tops the RAV4 range just under $49,000, but adding the Premium package for features like an onboard charger, a head-up display, a panoramic sunroof, heated rear seats, and additional amenities can push the price above $50,000, surpassing the comfort zone for a RAV4 buyer.
Despite our preference for the efficient RAV4 Prime powertrain and its 42 miles of pure electric range suitable for city driving, we understand that nightly charging may not appeal to all. In such cases, we recommend the XLE Hybrid RAV4 costing less than $35,000 as the budget-friendly AWD option.
Advantage: CX-50 for gas models, Toyota for hybrid and plug-in hybrid choices.
- Towing, Touring, and Performance Comparison between RAV4 and CX-50
- The Mazda CX-50 excels in handling and steering capabilities
- The RAV4 offers good albeit unremarkable driving dynamics
- The RAV4 Hybrid and Prime stand out as more intriguing selections
Is the Mazda CX-50 equipped with 4WD?
The CX-50 comes standard with all-wheel drive and a 6-speed automatic transmission that channels power from the 2.5-liter inline-4 engine. Generating 187 hp and 186 lb-ft of torque, the engine operates adequately. The 6-speed transmission allows for higher revs, thereby delivering increased power once on the move, albeit potentially leading to a louder cabin ambiance. Selecting Sport or Off-road modes adjusts the throttle response, with the latter enabling a boost in low-end torque and brake-based torque vectoring for modest off-road capability.
For those seeking more dynamism, the available 2.5-liter turbo-4 engine enhances the Mazda experience. Delivering 227 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque (using regular gasoline; with 93-octane fuel, output reaches 256 hp/320 lb-ft of torque), this engine pairs well with the 6-speed transmission, although it may exhibit lag during acceleration, even in Sport mode. The engine becomes more engaging above 2,000 rpm, offering a spirited performance especially on ramps and merges.
Mazda’s traditional strengths in steering precision and ride comfort shine through in the CX-50. Balancing comfort with control, the front strut and torsion beam rear suspension strike a harmonious blend, neither too stiff nor too soft. While not intended for aggressive cornering, the CX-50 responds promptly without necessitating frequent adjustments due to its electric-assist steering system.
Is the Toyota RAV4 equipped with 4WD?
The Toyota RAV4 is available with front-wheel drive or optional all-wheel drive, which comes standard on Hybrid, Prime, TRD Off-road, and independent of.Journey levels. Non-hybrids exhibit a basic front-to-rear power distribution, while Hybrids and Prime RAV4s utilize an additional motor to propel the rear axle, with the engine and primary motor powering the front tires.
The RAV4 boasts more zest thanks to its 203-hp 4-cylinder engine mated with an 8-speed automatic transmission, yet this doesn’t translate to quieter operation than the CX-50. When pushed, it might even be noisier and buzzier. The 219-hp Hybrid model pairs this engine with a two-motor system and a continuously variable transmission that promotes more fuel-efficient driving and enables electric-only propulsion under gentle throttle. The RAV4 Prime stands out with the highest power output at 302 hp. It combines the engine with two motors fueled by an 18.1-kWh battery pack, allowing the RAV4 to sprint to 60 mph in 5.7 seconds while offering a range of pure electric driving.
Nevertheless, the battery imparts a weighty feel on the road, although the vehicle still steers with precision and delivers a finely-tuned ride. Across the board, all RAV4 variants exhibit superior steering and handling compared to their predecessors from a few years ago.
Advantage: The CX-50 surpasses the base RAV4, but lags behind the RAV4 Hybrid and Prime models.
- RAV4 vs. CX-50 fuel efficiency
- The 6-speed automatic in Mazda models isn’t contributing positively
- The RAV4 achieves a minimum of 28 mpg combined
- The RAV4 Prime boasts a plug-in range of 42 miles
Is the Mazda CX-50 fuel-efficient?
The CX-50 falls below average in fuel economy for its class of compact crossovers. More gears in its transmission could potentially lower its engine revs for improved efficiency. Despite having standard all-wheel drive, it trails competitors like the Subaru Forester and Honda CR-V by at least 2 mpg in combined fuel efficiency with all-wheel drive. The EPA ratings state the following:
- The 2.5-liter variant achieves 24 mpg city, 30 highway, 27 combined
- The 2.5-liter Turbo model achieves 23/29/25 mpg
Is the Toyota RAV4 fuel-efficient?
Yes, and the efficiency gets a boost with the Hybrid and Prime plug-in hybrid versions. The hybrid variants come equipped with standard all-wheel drive, while the base inline-4 engine and 8-speed automatic transmission ensure smooth and efficient operation. The Limited and TRD Off-road models witness a slight decrease of 1 mpg compared to the AWD base model due to factors like wheel and tire sizes or additional vehicle weight.
The base inline-4 model achieves 27/34/30 mpg in most setups; AWD setup decreases efficiency by 1 mpg
The RAV4 Hybrid AWD variant reaches 41/38/39 mpg; The Hybrid AWD Woodland edition drops to 38/35/37 mpg
The RAV4 Prime showcases a 42-mile electric range; with combined power from the engine and motor, it offers the equivalent of 94 mpg; with only engine power, it offers 38 mpg combined.
Advantage: The RAV4 falls short compared to the improved Hybrid and Prime models.
How secure is the Mazda CX-50?
As per the IIHS, it boasts top-notch crash-test ratings, excellent headlights, and the prestigious Top Safety Pick+ award. All models come equipped with automatic emergency braking, active lane control, blind-spot monitors, automatic high beams, and adaptive cruise control capable of coming to a stop. However, rearward visibility is a downside, with the availability of a surround-view camera system and parking sensors as potential solutions.
How safe is the Toyota RAV4?
While the RAV4 is considered safe, it falls short of the top accolade from the IIHS and settles for a Top Safety Pick due to the updated side-impact test results. On the other hand, it earns five stars from the NHTSA, although the criteria are perceived as outdated compared to those of the IIHS. Toyota matches the driver assistance features found in the CX-50, offering standard automatic emergency braking, automatic high-beam headlights, active lane control, and adaptive cruise control. Similar to the CX-50, it too faces challenges with rear vision due to thick roof pillars.
Advantage: The CX-50 holds an edge, yet both models boast superior safety features compared to most rivals.
- RAV4 vs. CX-50 dimensions, interior space, and storage capacity
- The CX-50 sizes up larger than the CX-5 but slightly smaller in terms of interior spaciousness when compared to the RAV4
- With 31.4 cubic feet of cargo space, the CX-50 falls short of the RAV4’s 37.5 cubic feet
- However, the CX-50 offers more rear legroom at 39.8 inches in contrast to the RAV4’s 37.8 inches
How spacious is the Mazda CX-50?
In terms of dimensions, it appears as though Mazda designers patterned the RAV4 but managed to eke out a bit more passenger room. It boasts an additional length of 4.3 inches and a wheelbase that is nearly five inches longer. This translates to more roomy seating for four individuals, with the fifth seat suitable for young passengers or individuals with limited space requirements. Notably, this aligns with standard industry practices for this class of vehicles.
The front seats cater to all body types, with most trims offering power adjustments and seat warmers. Clad in leather upholstery, the interior exudes luxury, especially during stationary moments. However, during highway traversal, a noticeable amount of road and wind noise may seep into the cabin. Despite standing 5.3 inches shorter in height compared to the RAV4, the CX-50’s slanted windshield and elevated seating positions in the RAV4 might pose constraints for taller occupants, particularly with a sunroof option.
How roomy is the Toyota RAV4?
The RAV4 boasts greater interior volume, chiefly owing to its cargo space offering of 37.0 cubic feet, surpassing the 31.4 cubic feet provided by the CX-50. Notably, the Prime model features slightly less space due to the rear placement of its battery. Toyota has optimized the interior layout effectively by introducing thoughtful storage compartments such as wide door pockets capable of holding large water bottles and a dashboard shelf suitable for items like smartphones, transponders, and even, cassette tapes.
Enhancing the overall interior experience, mid-to-top trims and hybrid models of the RAV4 feature comfortable bucket seats with power adjustments. The cabin can be customized to a premium standard, although the CX-50 seemingly executes this in a slightly more natural and comprehensive manner. The cargo area of the RAV4 reaches a generous 69.8 cubic feet, dwarfing the 56.3 cubic feet available in the CX-50.
Advantage: The CX-50 leads in passenger spaciousness and luxury, while the RAV4 triumphs in cargo capacity.
- CX-50 versus RAV4 appearance
- The CX-50 aims to resemble the RAV4 more than the CX-5
- The RAV4 continues to defy conventions
- Both cabins possess a touch of luxury
Does the Mazda CX-50 have an attractive design?
The CX-50 moves away from the sleek elegance of the CX-5 to cater to American preferences for grandeur, assertiveness, and abundance. It’s not unattractive, yet it doesn’t command attention either. Its wide grille, bulging fenders, simulated air vents, and squared edges make it blend in rather than stand out.
The interior introduces more individuality with a simple dashboard and orderly central display complemented by climate control buttons. The optional leather upholstery with elegant contrasting stitching leaves a lasting impression.
Is the Toyota RAV4 an aesthetically pleasing vehicle?
Toyota can replicate that interior layout in premium and hybrid variants. The interior displays more complexity, focusing on functionality, yet has evolved from the utilitarian RAV4 of the past.
The exterior flaunts bolder design features, almost as if it is aware of being a leading contender. It blends Tacoma and 4Runner characteristics, featuring a blunt front and pronounced fenders. It exhibits some sharp lines and folds, striking a balance without excess.
Advantage: RAV4.
Which is superior: Mazda CX-50 or Toyota RAV4?
It’s a close call. The CX-50 achieves a TCC Rating of 6.7 out of 10, while the RAV4 scores a 6.5 out of 10. The Mazda CX-50 delivers better on-road performance and a more refined interior. (Read more about how we rate cars.) The RAV4 boasts a higher fuel efficiency rating, even without considering the hybrid models. Our editorial team even differs on the design rating, but ultimately, their similarities are so striking that your choice will likely depend on the features that are most important to you.
Winner: The CX-50 takes the lead—just by a hair—but we’d opt for a RAV4 Hybrid.
Image Source: Sue Thatcher / Shutterstock